You are possibly wondering what is an inductive argument, well this is an argument whose premises offer a strong base or argument by supporting a particular conclusion. The supporting premises are the base for the argument and therefore the conclusion is dependent on the truth they lay across. Unlike deductive arguments where the argument is supposed to be factual and certain based on the outcome, the inductive argument is completely dependent on the premises that support it as they hold the evidence or support of the conclusion that is already laid out.
Here at PremierEssay.com we normally help you identify the inductive argument examples from various writings by giving you the guideline that; the supporting premises only then support a particular logic and truth but do not nail it as factual and this is what makes the main difference when compared to the deductive way of reasoning. An example of deductive argument would be; she smiles nicely, she has long brown hair, she has a slim body, she takes calculated steps, therefore she is very beautiful. As you have noted above the premises are all different supporting a specific conclusion. This is one of the examples of construct an inductive argument for a specific conclusion given a number of premises.
Strong Deductive and Weak Inductive Reasoning
As you have earlier seen the difference between the inductive and the deductive argument is based on the premises that are build. Well the deductive arguments take the fact that the premises will hold a true statement then it is not at all possible to have a false conclusion. This is what makes the weak inductive arguments as you might form an opinion that the inductive argument is not as strong as the deductive argument. Well with inductive arguments, the strength of the premises is what makes the conclusion strong and that of deductive argument seem to be strong enough as the premises are already held as true.
Our Professional team at PremierEssay.com have come to distinguish the difference between the two reasoning by pointing out the fact that, the premises in inductive reasoning all the possibility that the conclusion could be wrong as opposed to deductive reasoning where the premises are already held to be true in nature and a times just factual this argument is used to define inductive argument as opposed to the deductive. However the examples of inductive arguments are not always misleading out of the premises that make them, they also add additional information to the context leaving the reader with better knowledge of a particular analogy. Therefore the inductive reasoning is majorly used in almost every curriculum in learning other than in factual cases such as mathematics and physics which majorly dwell on deductive reasoning and application.
Biases in Inductive Reasoning
Inductive argument definition is based on conclusions made on the available information which in this case are the premises. Therefore they can impose a wrong impression and therefore leading to the person interpreting the information to make a wrong conclusion. Often you will realize that the kind of information available to a certain phenomenon is taken to be true and logical to support a strong base of a conclusion. Therefore as you argue your points by having to construct an inductive argument for a specific conclusion, then you should be careful not to let your data be compromised by bias.
Inductive argument examples in which people would react in a biased way would include; when people are asked what the main causes of death are, they tend to rely on the available information and mostly the one they find via the media. Therefore they will make opinions based on the fact that the main causes are diseases accidents and possibly terror attacks. With the influence of deductive reasoning posing as a challenge of bias, it is then advice able for you to use examples of an inductive argument for a specific conclusion using premises that are supportive of a true argument and conclusion. The bias is normally made out of the fact that the reader will be inclined to confirm other than deny a particular hypothesis.
Use of Argument from Analogy
At PremierEssay.com we define inductive argument as forming a conclusion from properties of analogy by relating to these properties. When a particular property x is related to another y, then property x having characteristics such as b and a, then it would be reasonable to form a conclusion that y has the characteristics b and a. it is this kind of reasoning that helps to construct an inductive argument for a specific conclusion when forming an argument. The analogy is based on linking information form one sentence to another.
The premises are definitely independent and stand-alone if they were taken as individual clauses or sentences. It is in their descriptive nature that the reader is able to flow and make logic out of them. The analogy is based on information that helps you to make conclusions that are similar to what another person would interpret. The way you are able to view the premises to make the conclusion should be similar, however due to the independence of the clauses or premises used, there could be a similar interpretation or conclusion that you are another informed individual can make out. This is different from deductive reasoning where the conclusion cannot be false due to the factual or truthful nature of the premises used.
Do not know exactly what you need?
Want to make sure we can do your assignment? Send us everything you have and our expert writers will evaluate your order and generate a proposal!
What is also important - evaluation is free!Evaluate